The AON/WTW Merger -- To B Or Not To Plan B

Simone Lavelle, Oct 13, 2020 6:27:29 PM

Five years ago almost to the day a good friend was caught up in the merger of two global asset management organisations, let’s call them AM1 and AM2.  A key and valued employee at AM1, she was offered an identical role at the merged entity, which it was clear would be dominated by AM2. Much to my surprise, she turned down the offer. The rationale for her decision was interesting - “If I had wanted to pursue a career at AM2 I would have accepted a role that had been offered to me there three years ago.”

Recently we met up, virtually, and I enquired how her decision had worked out. Whilst it was not perfect, she explained, the fact that she was her pursuing her chosen career path was a source of considerable satisfaction. She had remained in control of her own career plan.

uncertainty

There are interesting parallels here with the dilemma currently facing clients of Aon and WTW. At some stage in the past, each of their pension fund clients took the decision to enter a relationship with these organisations, agreeing what the nature of the contract between them would be. Some, for example, may only recently have changed their advisor from Aon to WTW, and now face finding themselves back at the organisation they deliberately left, or vice versa.

By deciding to merge, Aon and WTW have introduced uncertainty in respect of how that contract will now be experienced by their customers.  Were they to decide to take no action, each of these pension funds face the possibility of arriving at a place they did not plan to travel to.

"By deciding to merge, Aon and WTW have introduced uncertainty in respect of how that contract will now be experienced by their customers."

 They do have options, and the choices they make now will determine the extent to which their future is the one they had been planning for.

Given this reality, it would not be surprising if each pension fund was giving active consideration to a potential Plan B in respect of their consultant relationships.

 

 

More on the aon / wtw merger:

A pinch of salt -- thoughts on the Aon / WTW merger part 1

Advice sure isn't what it used to be -- thoughts on the Aon/ WTW merger part 2

Synergy? A 1970's disco perspective -- thoughts on the Aon/ WTW merger part 3

The Aon/ WTW merger -- you have more power than you think 

The Aon/WTW merger-- A Keynesian perspective

The WTW/ Aon merger: A customer temperature update

The WTW / Aon merger: UK Pension Plans' Virgil van Dijk moment

The WTW / Aon merger: Talk About Governance

Read our full report on the Aon / WTW merger (pdf)

 

Is Big Really Beautiful?  Notes on the discussion on  the AON/WTW merger  Download the full report  Time for Plan B?  Our second report on the discussion on  the Willis Towers Watson / Aon merger  Download the full report

TOPICS:

FEATURED RESOURCES

Related Articles

Does the break-up of the Aon/WTW merger mean anything for pension funds? (Hint: yes it does!)

Jul 30, 2021 11:18:48 AM

As you will have heard, the recent Aon and Willis Tower Watson merger has fallen through. The..

Read More

Are your Chairs doing the right thing for your pension fund?

Jul 27, 2021 11:31:03 AM

The second blog on our Deadly Sins series is about Chairs, their boards and the potential pitfalls..

Read More

Your Fiduciary Manager has more sway than you think!

Jul 19, 2021 10:46:10 AM

A question which all pension funds should consider is whether their Fiduciary Manager has any..

Read More

There is nothing worse than bad delegation- especially for pension funds!

Jul 14, 2021 10:08:12 AM

In a recent introductory piece on governance, we set out that "At Avida International we observe a..

Read More